
So, YB, are you going to now issue a statement saying that you made an error and that only anal and oral sex are crimes whereas gay relationships are not a crime according to Malaysian law? And if people live together as gay couples and only kiss, hug, touch, rub against each other, masturbate each other, but as long as there is no anal or oral sex, then the government can’t do anything about it?
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Malaysia Today: First of all, Yang Berhormat, thank you so much for agreeing to this interview.
Yang Berhormat: I am always happy to talk to the media, even opposition media like Malaysia Today, which never reports the truth and always twists and distorts what we say.
MT: Well, YB, we are here today so that you can clarify what you actually said and which you claim has been misreported. You can also take this opportunity to clarify government policy and clear whatever misconceptions or wrong perceptions the public may have. And I promise you, YB, Malaysia Today will report exactly what you said without any editing.
YB: Thank you. That is very comforting to hear. First of all, I want the readers to know that I never said that homosexuality is against the Federal Constitution. I said it is against the law.
MT: Yes, that is now very clear. In fact, earlier today, Malaysia Today published your clarification and rebuttal. So we are not really as unfair as some allege, YB.
YB: Good. And thank you. At least Malaysia Today allows both sides of the story, not like some other opposition newspapers that only report bad things about the government.
MT: Actually Malaysia Today is not a newspaper and neither is it opposition owned. Malaysia Today is a sounding board for Malaysians to express their unhappiness with both the government and the opposition. Anyway, that is not the point, YB. What we want to talk about today is your statement regarding homosexuality being against the law. You quoted the section of the law regarding sodomy. It talks about sodomy, not about homosexuality. That section of the law does not say that homosexuality is a crime. It only says that sodomy is a crime.
YB: It is automatic. If it involves homosexuality then automatically it involves sodomy.
MT: But, YB, that section of the law also makes it a crime for a husband and wife to have anal sex. So heterosexual anal sex also attracts a 20-year jail sentence, even if it is between legally married couples. Why did YB not also stress on this fact: that husbands and wives can also get sent to jail, not just homosexuals?
YB: We are not concerned about married couples and what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. We are only concerned about what homosexuals do in the privacy of their bedrooms.
MT: But that is beside the point, YB. It is still the law that married couples who indulge in anal sex can be sent to jail for 20 years, until such a time that this law is amended and stipulates that anal sex is a crime only for those who indulge in same-sex relationships.
YB: How can we control what married people do in their bedrooms? It is impossible to monitor what people do in the privacy of their bedrooms.
MT: Yet the government wants to monitor what non-married people or gay couples do in the privacy of their bedrooms. How are you going to do this?
YB: Well…I….I….
MT: Never mind, YB. Let’s move on. The law says that anal sex is a crime. It does not say that homosexuality is a crime. What happens if two people of the same sex live as husband and wife but they do not indulge in anal sex? How can you arrest and charge them?
YB: How can they live together but not have sex?
MT: They can always indulge in oral sex, YB.
YB: You mean they live together as a married couple and just talk about sex? I don’t believe that.
MT: No, YB, I don’t mean oral sex as in talking about sex. I mean….well, you know YB…..lick, lick, suck, suck.
YB: Oh, that oral sex! Oral sex is also a crime. It is also punishable by 20 years jail, even if between husbands and wives.
MT: Okay, YB, you may be thinking of homosexual relationships as just being between two men. What if the homosexual relationship is between two women? Are you still going to say that it is a crime since there is no sodomy or anal sex involved? And take note, YB, that section of the law you are talking about makes it a crime to indulge in anal sex, not to be a homosexual.
YB: Well, if it is two women, then they probably have oral sex. So that means it is also a crime.
MT: So, it is the sex act that is the crime then. Being homosexual or living as a gay couple is not a crime. Is that right, YB?
YB: Well….yes, that is right.
MT: So, YB, are you going to now issue a statement saying that you made an error and that only anal and oral sex are crimes whereas gay relationships are not a crime according to Malaysian law? And if people live together as gay couples and only kiss, hug, touch, rub against each other, masturbate each other, but as long as there is no anal or oral sex, then the government can’t do anything about it?
YB: Well…I…..I….
MT: Never mind, YB, let’s move on. Let us now talk about non-Muslims, in particular Evangelists, preaching or propagating Christianity to Muslims, which has been an issue of late.
YB: Yes, according the Constitution that is wrong. So the government can take action.
MT: Okay, agreed. According to Article 11(4) of the constitution, it says: “State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.” But what about if that person may have been born a Muslim but he later leaves Islam. That means you are technically no longer propagating to Muslims but to ex-Muslims.
YB: There is no such thing as ex-Muslims. Once you are born a Muslim or you convert to Islam then you are a Muslim forever until the day you die.
MT: But what are the criteria to be a Muslim?
YB: I don’t understand.
MT: Is it not compulsory that you believe in one God, Allah, and accept Muhammad as the last Prophet, the Quran as God’s word, and the belief in the Afterlife, and so on? And if you reject this doctrine then your akidah would be demolished and you would cease to be a Muslim?
YB: Yes, your akidah is important in Islam. If your akidah is defective then you are no longer a Muslim.
MT: So, if a Muslim says he does not believe that Muhammad is the last Prophet or he says he doubts that the Quran is from God but was in fact written by Muhammad’s people then he ceases to be a Muslim since he no longer has akidah.
YB: Yes.
MT: So where is the crime then if the Evangelists preach or propagate Christianity to these people since technically they are not Muslims any longer?
YB: Well….I….I….but still we can’t allow it. They may be ex-Muslims according to Islam but we still regard them as Muslims and will arrest them and send them for religious rehabilitation to try to bring them back to the right path.
MT: So the government regards them as non-Muslims or ex-Muslims but will not allow them to be non-Muslims or ex-Muslims and will arrest them and rehabilitate them and that is why Christians can’t preach to them or propagate Christianity to them?
YB: Yes, that is correct.
MT: Thank you, YB. We hope with this clarification Malaysians can now better understand how the mind of the Malaysian government works.
Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2012/01/blog-post_9824.html

written by albert zacharias, November 23, 2011 17:29:56
Many Dogs, Monkeys, Horses also practice oral sex! Why the gomen don't catch them all and put in jail???
Bodoh lah gomen BN!
written by losyot, November 23, 2011 13:27:28
All (except for the rare few who have their hands tied) of the branch of government in our country are a bunch of 'jokers'. This is another one of their 'ingenuous' jokes that are meant to make us roll on the floor laughing our hearts out. Maybe its just a prelude to shafting our rear ends this coming elections. What are we going to do about a free and fair elections? Or are we just going to let them continue shafting our rear as always.
written by earthman, November 23, 2011 08:11:05
written by casper, November 23, 2011 06:56:05
I'm not an observer (too bon vivant) but as a citizen, how can I not feel 'malu' the caliber of this UMNO monkey ? Mere words don't do justice to describe Jo Broom's lack of grey matter which is beyond stupidity, his interpretation of the Penal Code (maybe his comprehension has it as "Penis Code") knowing how bad the level of English amongst monkeys in UMNO.
written by educationist, November 23, 2011 05:43:58
TQ, Arazak for the input about what Islamic teachings with respect oral sex is about!!
written by Motherchell, November 23, 2011 04:52:28
Can i presume now that YB Latok Jamil is in deep trouble for having not done justice??
Cheers and much regards !!
written by arazak, November 23, 2011 02:59:36
"In the presence of the Prophet Abu Bakr said to 'Urwa b. Mas'ud: "Go lick the clitoris of al-'Ab" "
There should be a "coma" after the word Prophet. . ., and should be read as;
"In the presence of the Prophet (SAW), Abu Bakr said to 'Urwa b. Mas'ud: "Go lick the clitoris of al-'Ab"
written by arazak, November 23, 2011 02:52:46
IF ISLAM DOES NOT FORBIDS ORAL SEX BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE, WHY IS UMNO KAY POH CHEE SAYING IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR AGAINST THE LAW?
It is related in Sahih al Bukhari, Vol 3, p 179:
In the presence of the Prophet Abu Bakr said to 'Urwa b. Mas'ud: "Go lick the clitoris of al-'Ab"
Abu Bakr said that to the Makkan people who had offended the Muslims during the Hudibiyah treaty.
---------------------------------------------------------
Now here are some views of oral sex in Islam from Wikipedia and others. . .
Sucking the wife's breasts and vagina
There is no Islamic text that forbids the sucking of a wife's breasts.
The Malikis allow licking the vagina (furj) stating that there is no harm in it, and it is not a hated act (makruh). Malik ibn Anas said that there is no harm in licking the vulva with thetongue.
Relation to sexual gratification
In the light of the Qur'an verse, Al-Mu'minun, five to seven scholars said that the husband is allowed to enjoy his wife through any means of enjoyment except for anal sex. Dr. Ali Jum`ah, professor of the Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence at Al-Azhar University, said that licking, sucking and kissing a spouse's sexual organs are all allowed, as long as it gives a person sexual gratification. This concept will keep him away from unlawfulness (haraam). It is allowed for a husband to lick his wife's vaginal area when it helps her have orgasm. Also, the wife can lick her husband's penis to cause erection and suck on it for an orgasm or ejaculation of semen. All sexual acts that aim at satisfying and pleasing the spouses are allowed except anal sex.
Genital secretions
Secretions from the vagina are pure. There is no hadith or verse that mentioned anything of vaginal discharge.[20] Similarly, many scholars view that semen is pure (taahir).
The Shafi`i Madh'hab said that the sperm of the male is pure, but pre-ejaculate, or "Madhy liquid", is najasa. The partners in fact might be licking the Madhy liquid which is najas before the ejaculation is completed. Hence it could be understood if this is the case then oral sex is makruh but certainly not haraam because there is no evidence to say so.
Muslim scholars are of the opinion that if the oral stimulation leads to ejaculation, then it is blameworthy (makruh), but there is no decisive evidence to forbid it. These parts are not dirty like the anus (dubur in Arabic). But there is no decisive evidence to make it unlawful, especially if the wife agrees with it or achieves orgasm by practicing it.
Avoiding secretions
If oral sex can be done in such a way that no filth is involved, then it would be considered lawful for a wife to kiss her husband's penis as long as she avoids any areas where there is pre-ejaculatory fluid, a loving couple could always use a condom, and a husband can kiss the outer parts of his wife's genitals and suck her clitoris (mentioned in many books of Hanbali fiqh) for her pleasure and satisfaction to an orgasm and it must be sure to rinse out mouths afterwards.
By using the Arab strap, condom or by holding base shaft in hand tightly, the discharge of impure secretions and contact with semen during oral sex may be avoided.
Bathing (ghusl) after oral sex
Oral sex is only permitted as a way of stimulation and foreplay. If a husband does have oral sex with his wife, and ejaculates semen, then ghusl is obligatory; however, if he only releases Madhy then Wudu is only required, and the wife has to wash the Madhy away. If during the course of oral stimulation, ejaculation takes place, one must wash it away if it gets in one’s clothing or mouth.
Conclusion;
Folks,
1. As you can see UMNO are a bunch of hypocrites especially Nazri and Jamil Khir. What they should do is get rid of this nonsense saying this and that is unconstitutional and illegal where some of the issues they raised are not forbidden in Islam.
2. Like a school yard bully, UMNO not only steals our money and walks away unpunished. They are also bullying us on what we should do and should not do with our sex lives. They are dictating what we should do and should not do in our bedrooms! Who the fcuk do they think they are?
Still wants to keep this bullying and corrupt regime?
written by Motherchell, November 22, 2011 23:19:46
written by panca, November 22, 2011 23:17:42
MT : Are you talking about clearing the air of your backside or Federal Constitution?
YB : got to go now, I think my wife is having a contraction!
MT : Your wife? Number what?
YB : The Fourth one of course!
written by panca, November 22, 2011 23:07:01
YB: Arh...no problem, always been, BTW go to go now, my son rushing me to go home, called to say he needs to use the Masturbate room since I am already married and he is not and need to use with bathroom attached.
MT: YB, I think you have got it all wrong, it is Masterbed room, not masturbate room, yunno Master as boss of the household!
YB : Wow, for the last 40 years I thought the term was masturbate room and have been doing that until I got married and now my son is doing what I am doing - masturb to pass his bachelor years!
MT : Any casulties with lizards?
YB : ....Arh...what casualties?
MT : Never mind!
YB : Main, mana tak main....
written by JJFoo, November 22, 2011 22:39:28
By now it is an undeniable fact that UMNO/BN government is practicing double-standard, there is no
rule-of-law in Malaysia only ruled-by-law.
written by lakian, November 22, 2011 22:18:17
written by Hanuman, November 22, 2011 21:57:38
written by hellosunshine, November 22, 2011 21:00:00
So, why is CSL still running around having his dick orally blown by his bitches?
written by vhari, November 22, 2011 20:55:34
Gay-Gay can live together
Government must set up spies on them 24 hrs
Any sodomy or oral sex seen
Arrest.Then Charge them
Then It will be a police state.
written by Angela Ooi, November 22, 2011 20:49:06
written by cheekymate, November 22, 2011 20:47:20
written by malsia1206, November 22, 2011 20:23:12
Meaning the guy who heard him and reported what he actually say must be deaf or suffering from partial hearing.
Just like that reporter in Karpal Singh's trial who never understand what was meant by 'ultra vires' and Karpal's speech became allegedly seditious.
So, we have either dumb YBs or dumb reporters. Or maybe we do have both.






















Is it fair to say UMNO is being un-Islamic forbidding oral sex?