The Tree Injunction – an opposite view from someone
Art Harun
I received an e-mail today. It bears no name of the sender. But the e-mal address of the sender is hafa_law@……..com. I do not know who the sender is but I note that "hafa" seems to be the first part of the name "Hafarizam".
Hafarizam is of course one of the the lawyers acting for Zambry or any one of the parties who were pro-BN (I must confess that I can't really remember exactly who he was acting for in the "tree injunction" case and so I stand corrected on this).
The e-mail contained an attachment. The sender said "Please read as per attached. Publish it inside your blog if you dare." I have read and I am going to publish it here. I just don't understand why the dare was thrown. There is no necessity for the dare. Feel free to send any article or post to me or any comment. Rest assured I will publish it.
For the record, I don't practise censorship. And my intention of having this blog is create awareness and to promote discourse. As long as the post or comment is not inflammatory or wrongful under the law, I would publish it. No problem.
I have replied to the said e-mail asking who the writer of the attachment is but I have not got a reply. And I can't verify whether the e-mail was sent by Hafarizam. I will publish an addendum as and when I receive a response to my query.
For the time being I am publishing the attachment to the said e-mail verbatim and as I received it without any edition of any kind. I don't even format it, lest I be accused of tampering.
The attachment reads as follows.
