Pieces of the puzzle
By SV Singam
The initial response of the MACC, the Selangor CPO, the Home Minister and other associated parties suggests a widespread attempt to cover up the truth. Such attempts to hide the truth suggest expectation of guilt. This guilt runs through the entire chain of command up to the Home Minister. The Deputy Prime Minister's initial response also implicates him in the attempted cover-up.
Important pieces of the puzzle of Teoh Beng Hock's death are starting to fit together.
1. Beng Hock was last seen alive at the MACC office around 6 am.
http://en.suarakeadilan.com/current-news/2009/07/12061
His mobile phone had not been returned to him so it is likely that his questioning was due to continue later that morning.
2. Time of death appears to have been between 8:30 – 9:30 am.
http://en.suarakeadilan.com/current-news/2009/07/12061
Who killed him and why he was killed remains a mystery.
3. The timber doors of the MACC office were shut between 1:15 and 1:50 pm. This is most unusual.
http://marhaen.info/v2/mar_a_kquek32.html
Very likely this was the time when his body was being pushed out through the window. By this time, rigor mortis would have set in, which explains the lack of bleeding and the rigid position of arms and legs when the body was "found".
http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/24563/84/
4. The MACC office window handle is broken.
http://en.suarakeadilan.com/current-news/2009/07/12061
This was probably where Teoh's pants caught and got torn as his body was pushed through.
The initial response of the MACC, the Selangor CPO, the Home Minister and other associated parties suggests a widespread attempt to cover up the truth. Such attempts to hide the truth suggest expectation of guilt. This guilt runs through the entire chain of command up to the Home Minister. The Deputy Prime Minister's initial response also implicates him in the attempted cover-up.
Questions that remain are…
1. Was Teoh's mobile phone routinely being held during his questioning and someone forgot to put it back into his pocket or did it contain damning evidence that someone was trying to erase?
2. Was Teoh killed during the interrogation or did he die because of some other cause? What cause? By whom? Why?
3. Was Teoh's death immediately notified to the MACC head or did he only come to know of it around lunchtime?
4. Who made the decision to fabricate evidence to suggest that Teoh died from a fall?
5. Was the CPO aware of what had actually happened when he "ruled out foul play" or was he shooting off his mouth?
6. Was the Home Minister aware of what had happened when he attacked the people trying to implicate the MACC or was he also shooting his mouth from his usually empty head?
7. Who first put forward the idea that Teoh had committed suicide?
8. Why is UMNO racialising this sad event? Do they just want to shift the focus elsewhere or do they have darker intentions in their effort to cling to power?
This being Bolehland, how many of the above questions can we expect to be answered satisfactorily?
