Musa Hassan is a liar! (UPDATED with BM and Chinese Translation)


“This involves an assessment of the credibility of the witness called by the prosecution. His evidence is unreliable and is to be disregarded and whatever he says in court lends to his discredit. I am in total agreement with the case for the defence that this lack of support of the evidence of PW75 (IGP Musa Hassan) on this point lends to his discredit. In this regard I should mention that PW75 in his evidence gave an interpretation that is contrariwise to the testimonies of PW17, PW19, PW57 and PW73. I found however that the evidence of PW75 on this to be unreliable and to be disregarded.”

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

“This involves an assessment of the credibility of the witness called by the prosecution. His evidence is unreliable and is to be disregarded and whatever he says in court lends to his discredit. I am in total agreement with the case for the defence that this lack of support of the evidence of PW75 (IGP Musa Hassan) on this point lends to his discredit. In this regard I should mention that PW75 in his evidence gave an interpretation that is contrariwise to the testimonies of PW17, PW19, PW57 and PW73. I found however that the evidence of PW75 on this to be unreliable and to be disregarded,” was the opinion of the court.

These are not my words. These are the words of Judge Supang Lian of the Kota Kinabalau Sessions Court in a 90-page Grounds of Decision about the lack of credibility and unreliability of Malaysia’s IGP, Musa Hassan, on why Dato’ Ramli Yusuff deserved to be acquitted of what Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak would classify as a frivolous charge. (See pages 1664, 1665, 1686, 1698, 1740, 1744 and 1745 of the MACC’s Appeal Record below).

As what has been revealed many times before this in numerous articles and special reports, IGP Musa Hassan wanted to get rid of Ramli Yusuff. One reason was to eliminate all suitable successors so that he could stay on as IGP beyond his retirement in August 2007. The second is because Ramli had uncovered the IGP’s links with the Chinese underworld prostitution, illegal gambling, loan sharking and drugs syndicate. Before this, Malaysia Today had in fact published more than a dozen Statutory Declarations signed by underworld figures as well as police officers, which included his own ADC.

The Unholy Trinity of the IGP, the AG and the MACC fabricated several charges against Ramli — including the frivolous charge that Ramli took a ‘joyride’ in a police Cessna — with an aim to bring him down.

Extracts of the Judgment below show that Ramli was actually on official duty that day and not ‘on a frolic of his own’, as the legal fraternity would say. Ramli was in fact surveying the porous Sabah coastline. And quite rightly so considering that yesterday the US government issued a travel advisory to its citizens to be wary of travelling to Sabah where they expect tourists to suffer acts of terrorism (See here: US warns of trouble in Sabah)

And just like in Anwar Ibrahim’s case, they amended the charge against Ramli because the evidence of the pilots, which were presented very late (PW69 and PW73), showed that Ramli was doing a security survey over Police PGA Post Den Haven and its coastline and was nowhere near the land they accused him of having an interest in.

In desperation, DPP Kevin Anthony Morais amended the charge from “using an aircraft to survey the land” to “diverting an aircraft to fly in the VICINITY of the land”. Only Kevin Morais will know what that actually means. And as if this case was more serious than even a murder case, Kevin presented 75 witnesses just to prove that Ramli took that unauthorised joyride.

IGP Musa Hassan (PW75) was the MACC’s so-called ‘Star Witness’. Yes, no less than the top dog himself testified during Ramli’s trial, an ‘honour’ indeed for Ramli. But Musa Hassan was so badly discredited by the Sessions Court Judge because of his twist-and-turn testimony. Despite this damning judgment, Kevin Morais has filed an appeal against Ramli’s acquittal when he should have instead admitted defeat and just crawl home with his tail between his legs to go lick his wounds like a good little faggot.

The MACC Advisory Panel should look into this lest the MACC gets further discredited and be made to look more the fool than it already is. 

Obviously, Kevin Morais has not learned his lesson. He now sits in the witness box as the ‘Star Witness’ in the ongoing trial of lawyer Rosli Dahlan where he was torn to pieces and stripped naked for all and sundry to see. The court in fact burst out laughing, the Judge included, to see Kevin being cornered like a mangy dog — my apologies to animal lovers the world over.

Kevin should by now have been impeached and cited for perjury.

Is that why Kevin has asked for a long break — so that he can ‘rearrange’ his story after his lie about the cheque butts or whatever butts that turns him on? 

Rosli Dahlan’s trial will resume on 31 May 2010. Expect Kevin to again get his knickers all twisted into knots when the lawyers seek his impeachment and ask that he get sent to jail for perjury. But I suppose a few years in jail and getting sexually molested by the other prisoners would be a great pleasure for someone like Kevin

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2010/01/blog-post_6092.html

Translated into BM by Jason Cheng:

Musa Hassan seorang pembohong!

“Ini melibatkan penilaian terhadap kredibiliti saksi yang dipanggil oleh pihak Pendakwa. Keterangan-keterangannya tidak boleh dipercayai dan perlu diabaikan, dan segala keterangannya menjejaskan kredibilitinya. Saya bersetuju dengan Pembelaan bahawa kurangnya sokongan bagi keterangan PW75 (KPN Musa Hassan) bagi perkara ini menjejaskan kredibilitinya. Dalam hal ini, saya perlu menyebut bahawa dalam keterangannya, PW75 memberikan tafsiran yang bertentangan dengan keterangan PW17, PW19, PW57 dan PW73. Walau bagaimanapun, saya mendapati bahawa keterangan PW75 mengenai perkaran ini tidak boleh dipercayai dan perlu diabaikan.”

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

“Ini melibatkan penilaian terhadap kredibiliti saksi yang dipanggil oleh pihak Pendakwa. Keterangan-keterangannya tidak boleh dipercayai dan perlu diabaikan, dan segala keterangannya menjejaskan kredibilitinya. Saya bersetuju dengan Pembelaan bahawa kurangnya sokongan bagi keterangan PW75 (KPN Musa Hassan) bagi perkara ini menjejaskan kredibilitinya. Dalam hal ini, saya perlu menyebut bahawa dalam keterangannya, PW75 memberikan tafsiran yang bertentangan dengan keterangan PW17, PW19, PW57 dan PW73. Walau bagaimanapun, saya mendapati bahawa keterangan PW75 mengenai perkaran ini tidak boleh dipercayai dan perlu diabaikan.” Ini adalah pandangan mahkamah.

Ini bukan kata-kata saya. Ini adalah kenyataan Hakim Supang Lian dari Mahkamah Sesyen Kota Kinabalau, iaitu dalam Alasan/Hujah Keputusan (Grounds of Decision) setebal 90 halaman. Ia adalah tentang kurangnya kredibiliti dan kebolehpercayaan KPN, Musa Hassan, tentang hujah yang membolehkan Dato’ Ramli Yusuff dibebaskan dari dakwaan yang dianggap semberono oleh Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Najib Tun Razak. (Lihat mukasurat 1664, 1665, 1686, 1698, 1740, 1744 dan 1745 dalam Rekod Rayuan SPRM di bawah).

Sebagaimana yang sudah banyak kali didedahkan dalam pelbagai artikel dan laporan khas sebelum ini, KPN Musa Hassan ingin menyingkirkan Ramli Yusuff. Salah satu sebab yang mendorongnya berbuat begitu adalah bagi menyingkirkan semua bakal penggantinya. Dengan demikian, dia dapat kekal sebagai KPN meskipun sepatutnya bersara pada Ogos 2007. Sebab kedua adalah kerana Ramli telah berjaya membongkar hubungan KPN dengan sindiket pelacuran, perjudian haram, ah long dan dadah yang membabitkan kongsi gelap Cina. Sebelum ini, Malaysia Today sudah pun memaparkan lebih daripada dua belas Akuan Bersumpah yang ditandatangani oleh anggota kongsi gelap dan juga pegawai polis, termasuklah ADC-nya sendiri.

Persekongkolan KPN-Peguam Negara-SPRM memalsukan beberapa pertuduhan terhadap Ramli – termasuklah dakwaan merapu tentang Ramli yang kononnya menyalahgunakan pesawat Cessna milik PDRM – dengan matlamat menjatuhkan Ramli.

Petikan dari Penghakiman di bawah ini menunjukkan bahawa pada hari itu, Ramli sebenarnya sedang menjalankan tugas rasmi dan bukannya bersuka-suka. Pada hari itu, Ramli sebenarnya meninjau pantai Sabah yang poros. Tindakannya itu ada justifikasinya, memandangkan baru semalam kerajaan Amerika Syarikat mengeluarkan nasihat perjalanan kepada warganegaranya supaya berhati-hati jika berkunjung ke Sabah, di mana mereka menjangka bahawa pelancong berhadapan dengan tindakan keganasan (Baca: US warns of trouble in Sabah).

Seperti dalam kes Anwar Ibrahim, mereka meminda pertuduhan terhadap Ramli kerana keterangan yang diberikan oleh juruterbang, yang amat lewat dikemukakan (PW69 dan PW73) menunjukkan bahawa Ramli sedang melakukan tinjauan keselamatan ke atas Pos PGA Polis Den Haven dan pantai sekitarnya, dan bukannya berdekatan dengan tanah yang kononnya dimiliki olehnya.

Disebabkan dia terdesak, DPP Kevin Anthony Morais meminda pertuduhan dari “menggunakan pesawat untuk meninjau tanah” kepada “pelencongan pesawat untuk terbang di SEKITAR tanah”. Hanya Kevin Morais yang tahu makna pernyataannya itu… berbelit-belit. Tak cukup dengan tu, Kevin mengemukakan 75 orang saksi hanya untuk membuktikan bahawa Ramli menyalahgunakan pesawat PDRM. Macamlah kes ni lagi serius daripada kes bunuh.

KPN Musa Hassan (PW75) adalah saksi utama SPRM. Ya, KPN sendiri memberikan keterangan semasa perbicaraan Ramli. ‘Bertuah’ sungguh si Ramli. Tetapi disebabkan keterangannya yang penuh dengan putar belit, Musa Hassan diaibkan dengan teruk sekali oleh Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen. Meskipun berhadapan dengan penghakiman tersebut, Kevin Morais ada hati lagi nak kemukakan rayuan terhadap pembebasan Ramli. Sudahlah tu, Kevin. Dia sepatutnya mengaku kalah dan kembali ke dalam kepompongnya.

Panel Penasihat SPRM perlu meneliti perkara ini bagi mengelakkan SPRM dari terus diaibkan, malah terus menjadi bahan jenaka masyarakat.

Apa yang jelas adalah Kevin Morais masih tak faham-faham. Kini, dia adalah saksi utama bagi pertuduhan terhadap Rosli Dahlan, di mana segala keterangannya dipersendakan. Malah mahkamah, termasuklah Hakim ketawa terbahak-bahak melihat Kevin terperangkap bak anjing kurap – kepada para pencinta binatang di seluruh dunia, saya minta maaf banyak-banyak.

Kevin sepatutnya didakwa atas kesalahan sumpah bohong.
Adakah itu sebabnya Kevin meminta penangguhan yang panjang – supaya dia dapat ‘menyusun semula’ ceritanya selepas dia berbohong tentang ceraian cek (cheque butt) yang berkenaan?

Perbicaraan Rosli Dahlan akan bersambung pada 31 Mei 2010. Pada masa tu, dah tentu dia kembali terketar-ketar apabila para peguam memohon supaya dia didakwa dan dipenjarakan atas kesalahan sumpah bohong. Tetapi saya rasa orang macam Kevin dah tentu cukup seronok menghabiskan beberapa tahun di penjara dan mendapat ‘habuan’ seksual daripada lain-lain banduan.
 



Comments
Loading...