How, yet again, they are trying to fabricate evidence against Anwar (UPDATED with BM and Chinese Translation)

ARCHIVES 2010

By MT Webmaster On Feb 4, 2010

The ‘evidence’ is ready. The semen specimen on Saiful’s underwear has been ‘confirmed’ as Anwar’s. The only problem is if they allow an independent foreign expert to do an audit on the Chemistry Department’s findings, he or she might confirm that the specimen is ten years old and not dated 26 June 2008 as alleged.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

It was a great party that night. The Chemistry Department was so pleased they had an airtight case against Anwar Ibrahim they decided to celebrate. And the RM25,000 party was financed by a Good Samaritan who was delighted that this time, unlike last time, they have got Anwar by the balls.

RM25,000 is not a lot to spend on a party if it is a party to celebrate the wedding of the Prime Minister. Last year, when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi got married to the Maid from Putrajaya, they spent millions. RM25,000 is also not a lot to spend on a celebration the day Najib Tun Razak finally takes over as Prime Minister in 2010. Rosmah Mansor spends more than that on a handbag. But RM25,000 is certainly a lot to spend on a party to celebrate the ‘success’ of the Chemistry Department in being able to nail Anwar’s balls to the wall.

Why does the Good Samaritan need to sponsor a RM25,000 party for the Chemistry Department staff? What is there to celebrate? Do they always celebrate with a RM25,000 party whenever they succeed in cracking a case? Or was this a once-in-a-lifetime celebration for successfully coming up with the ‘evidence’ to send Anwar to jail for at least ten years, which will ensure he will never be able to form the new federal government on 16 September 2008?

Hold on awhile though. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that Anwar must volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile. The 1998 DNA profile that the police have on record is ‘too old’, argued Abdullah. The police, in turn, said that if Anwar refuses to volunteer his ‘new’ DNA profile then they would have to obtain a court order to force him to do so. Hmm…..there appears to be many things wrong with all this.

Firstly, if the Chemistry Department has already wrapped up its case and the airtight ‘evidence’ against Anwar has already been secured then why the need for Anwar’s new DNA profile? DNA profiles never expire. Would the police also need Anwar’s ‘new’ fingerprints because the one they took ten years ago has ‘expired’? Fingerprints never change from the day you were born till the day you die. And the same goes for DNA profiles as well.

If you can remember, they once dug up Napoleon Bonaparte’s grave and did an examination to prove he had died of arsenic poisoning. And Napoleon died on 5 May 1821, which is more than 187 years ago. You mean to say that Anwar’s DNA profile of ten years ago is already basi?

The truth is, the airtight ‘evidence’ that the Chemistry Department recently conjured is based on Anwar’s specimen of 1998. So they need a new specimen dated 2008. If not, if Anwar calls in an independent foreign expert to audit the Chemistry Department’s evidence, he or she might just discover that the so-called ‘evidence’ is actually ten years old and not from the 26 June 2008 ‘sodomy’ incident as alleged by the government.

Yes, that’s right, they not only can tell whether the so-called ‘semen’ on Saiful’s underwear belongs to Anwar, they can also tell whether it is from September 1998 when they first took Anwar’s specimen, or whether it is dated 26 June 2008 as alleged by the government.

So they need to exchange the September 1998 specimen with a new one dated July 2008. And that is why Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Syed Hamid Albar, and all those others, have asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen. They need this new specimen to ‘prove’ that the semen on Saiful’s underwear is dated 26 June 2008 and not September 1998. And Abdullah himself ‘confirmed’ this when he asked Anwar to volunteer his new specimen whereas the old specimen is good enough if it is just required for DNA profiling — only that it would not pass the test if an independent foreign expert was to audit the Chemistry Department’s ‘evidence’ and then come out with a report that says the specimen is ten years old.

Yes, in September 1998 they already took Anwar’s specimen. But they can’t use it as evidence in this latest sodomy allegation. They need to ‘update’ the evidence and unless they can force Anwar to give them his new specimen then the evidence will be shot full of holes. And that is why the police had to reluctantly release Anwar on police bail one day after his dramatic Hollywood-style arrest. They had to either release him or bring him to court to be charged. But how to charge Anwar when the evidence is defective? And evidence of Anwar’s so-called sodomy crime supported by a specimen from September 1998 will certainly be defective and will not stand up in court. Anwar is alleged to have sodomised Saiful on 26 June 2008, not in September 1998.

Now can you see how the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP work? And these two slithery creatures are the same slime-balls and scumbags who fabricated evidence in 1998 that resulted in Anwar having to spend six years in jail. And am I committing an act of sedition and criminal defamation in saying this? I certainly hope so. And, while we are at it, why not I commit yet another ‘crime’? I am going to accuse the AG and IGP of fabricating evidence and of intimidating witnesses.

You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.

Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.

The ‘evidence’ against Anwar is no good. They now need to look for another way to ‘prove’ that Anwar sodomised Saiful. In the meantime, let us see if the AG will be making another police report against me and whether the IGP is going to arrest me and charge me in court for sedition and criminal defamation for this latest allegation of mine.

Hey, I already face four charges of sedition and criminal defamation. What are another two or three charges? The important thing is not whether I get sent to jail or not. What is important is that the world is told that they are attempting, yet again, to fabricate evidence against Anwar Ibrahim. And that is worth going to jail for.

THE ABOVE ARTICLE WAS FIRST PUBLISHED ON 21 JULY 2008. SOON AFTER THAT I WAS SUMMONED TO BUKIT AMAN BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO ‘TAKE MY STATEMENT’ ON A CHARGE OF SEDITION. I REFUSED TO GIVE MY STATEMENT AND THE POLICE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO RELEASE ME. THEY THEN RAIDED MY HOUSE TO LOOK FOR THE DOCTOR’S REPORT AND CONFISCATED VARIOUS DOCUMENTS. THEY COULD NOT FIND MY COMPUTER THOUGH ALTHOUGH THEY SEARCHED THE ENTIRE HOUSE. LESS THAN TWO MONTHS LATER I WAS DETAINED UNDER THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT.

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2010/02/blog-post_5312.html

Translated into BM by Jason:

Bagaimana mereka sekali lagi cuba memalsukan bukti terhadap Anwar

Bukti’ sudah tersedia. Spesimen air mani pada seluar dalam Saiful telah ‘disahkan’ sebagai air mani Anwar. Masalahnya adalah jika mereka membenarkan pakar asing yang bebas bagi mengaudit dapatan Jabatan Kimia itu, maka akan terbuktilah bahawa spesimen itu berusia sepuluh tahun dan bukannya bertarikh 26 Jun 2008, sebagaimana yang didakwa.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Malam tu, mereka berparti sakan. Jabatan Kimia begitu gembira kerana beranggapan bahawa mereka ada kes yang kukuh terhadap Anwar Ibrahim, hinggakan mereka meraikannya. Parti dengan kos RM25,000 tu ditanggung oleh seorang Individu Baik yang gembira bahawa kali ni, tak seperti perbicaraan yang sebelumnya, Anwar berada dalam tangan mereka.

RM25,000 untuk berparti bukannya banyak sangat jika ia adalah bagi meraikan perkahwinan Perdana Menteri. Tahun lalu, berjuta dibelanjakan bagi perkahwinan Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. RM25,000 juga bukannya banyak sangat bagi meraikan pengambil alihan Najib Tun Razak sebagai Perdana Menteri pada tahun 2010. Malah Rosmah Mansor membelanjakan lebih daripada tu untuk membeli beg tangan. Tetapi RM25,000 sememangnya jumlah yang besar bagi merayakan ‘kejayaan’ Jabatan Kimia menjerat Anwar.

Tetapi mengapakah Individu Baik tu perlu membiayai parti RM25,000 untuk kakitangan Jabatan Kimia? Nak raikan apanya? Adakah mereka akan membelanjakan RM25,000 setiap kali mereka berjaya menyelesaikan sesuatu kes? Atau adakah ini parti ‘sekali seumur hidup’ atas kejayaan mereka menjumpai ‘bukti’ bagi menghantar Anwar ke penjara selama sekurang-kurangnya sepuluh tahun, yang akan memastikan bahawa beliau takkan dapat membentuk kerajaan Persekutuan yang baru pada 16 September 2008?

Eh, tunggu kejap. Perdana Menteri, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi berkata bahawa Anwar perlu memberikan profil DNA ‘barunya’. Menurut Abdullah, profil DNA tahun 1998 yang disimpan polis adalah ‘terlalu tua’. Pada masa yang sama, polis pula berkata bahawa jika Anwar menolak untuk memberikan profil DNA ‘barunya’, maka mereka akan mendapatkan perintah mahkamah bagi memaksanya berbuat demikian. Mmm… ada banyak yang tak kena, ni.

Pertama sekali, kalau Jabatan Kimia sudah mempunyai kes yang kukuh terhadap Anwar, maka mengapakah mereka memerlukan profil DNA Anwar yang baru? Kita perlu sedar bahawa profil DNA takkan pernah berubah. Kalau ya, maka adakah polis juga perlu mendapatkan cap jari Anwar yang ‘baru’ kerana cap jarinya dah berubah? Hakikatnya adalah cap jari tak pernah berubah sejak kita dilahirkan sampailah saat kematian kita. Hakikat yang sama terpakai bagi profil DNA.

Jika anda masih ingat, kubur Napoleon Bonaparte pernah digali semula. Mereka kemudiannya menjalankan ujian bagi membuktikan bahawa dia telah meninggal akibat keracunan arsenik. Napoleon meninggal dunia pada 5 Mei 1821, iaitu lebih daripada 187 tahun yang lalu. Jadi, logikkah apabila mereka mengatakan bahawa profil DNA Anwar sepuluh tahun yang lalu sudah basi?

Sebenarnya, ‘bukti’ kukuh yang diperoleh Jabatan Kimia baru-baru ini adalah berdasarkan spesimen Anwar pada tahun 1998. Jadi, mereka memerlukan spesimen baru yang bertarikh 2008. Jika tidak, jika Anwar memohon supaya ‘bukti’ Jabatan Kimia itu diaudit oleh pakar asing yang bebas, maka pakar itu mungkin mendapati bahawa spesimen yang kononnya ‘bukti kukuh’ itu sebenarnya berusia sepuluh tahun, dan bukannya dari insiden ‘liwat’ 26 Jun 2008, sebagaimana yang didakwa oleh kerajaan.

Ya, mereka (para pakar) bukan hanya mampu menentukan sama ada ‘air mani’ yang terdapat pada seluar dalam Saiful itu milik Anwar ataupun tidak, malah mampu menentukan sama ada ia adalah spesimen bertarikh September 1998 ataupun spesimen bertarikh 26 Jun 2008, sebagaimana yang didakwa oleh kerajaan.

Jadi, mereka perlu menukar spesimen September 1998 dengan spesimen baru yang bertarikh Julai 2008. Itulah sebabnya Perdana Menteri, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi dan Syed Hamid Albar, dan yang lain-lain meminta Anwar supaya memberikan spesimen barunya. Mereka memerlukan spesimen baru ini bagi ‘membuktikan’ bahawa air mani pada seluar dalam Saiful adalah bertarikh 26 Jun 2008 dan bukannya September 1998. Malah Abdullah sendiri ‘mengesahkan’ perkara ini apabila dia meminta Anwar memberikan specimen barunya, walhal bagi pemprofilan (profiling) DNA, spesimen lama sudah memadai – tetapi jika ‘bukti’ Jabatan Kimia itu diaudit oleh pakar asing yang bebas, maka akan terbuktilah bahawa spesimen itu berusia sepuluh tahun.

Ya, pada bulan September 1998, mereka sudah pun mengambil spesimen Anwar. Namun mereka tidak boleh menggunakannya sebagai bukti dalam tuduhan liwat terbaru ini. Mereka perlu ‘mengemaskinikan’ bukti mereka, dan melainkan mereka dapat memaksa Anwar bagi memberikan spesimen baru kepada mereka, maka bukti tu menjadi terlalu lemah. Itulah sebabnya polis terpaksa melepaskan Anwar dengan jaminan polis sehari selepas beliau ditangkap ala filem aksi Hollywood. Mereka hanya ada dua pilihan, iaitu membebaskannya ataupun mendakwanya di mahkamah. Tetapi nak dakwa macam mana kalau bukti tak kukuh? Realitinya adalah ‘bukti’ yang berdasarkan spesimen bertarikh September 1998 tu sememangnya tak kukuh dan takkan membolehkan mereka mendapatkan sabitan. Ini kerana Anwar dituduh meliwat Saiful pada 26 Jun 2008, dan bukannya September 1998.

Nah, sekarang baru anda tahu bagaimana cara dua ekor kucing kurap, Peguam Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara beroperasi. Kedua-dua ekor kucing kurap inilah yang memalsukan bukti pada tahun 1998, yang mana mengakibatkan Anwar dipenjarakan selama enam tahun. Dengan berkata demikian, adakah saya bersalah atas jenayah hasutan dan fitnah? Ya, tulah yang saya harapkan. Alang-alang, baik saya lakukan satu lagi ‘jenayah’. Saya akan menuduh Peguam Negara dan Ketua Polis Negara memalsukan bukti dan menakut-nakutkan saksi.

Begini… sebenarnya, mereka meminta seorang doktor dari sebuah hospital bagi melakukan pemeriksaan kesihatan ke atas Saiful. Doktor itu melakukannya dan dalam laporannya, dia mengatakan tiada bukti bahawa Anwar pernah ‘menjolok’ ataupun meliwat pemuda tu. Pihak polis kemudiannya menangkap doktor tu dan menahannya selama tiga hari. Walaupun mereka cuba memaksanya supaya mengubah laporannya bagi membabitkan Anwar, dia enggan melakukannya.

Sehingga ke hari ini, doktor itu tetap bertegas bahawa tiada bukti bahawa Anwar telah meliwat Saiful. Dia tahu bahawa dia akan ‘kena’ disebabkan ketegasannya, tetapi dia tak peduli. Walau apa pun yang dilakukan kepadanya, dia takkan mengubah laporannya dan mengatakan bahawa Anwar meliwat Saiful. Pihak polis akhirnya terpaksa melepaskan Anwar atas bon peribadi ataupun jaminan polis. Doktor tu enggan mengubah laporannya, manakala Anwar pula enggan memberikan spesimen ‘barunya’.

Bukti’ terhadap Anwar tak cukup kukuh. Mereka kini terpaksa mencari cara lain bagi ‘membuktikan’ bahawa Anwar meliwat Saiful. Sementara itu, lantaran tuduhan saya yang terbaru ni, mari kita tunggu sama ada Peguam Negara akan membuat laporan polis yang lain terhadap saya dan sama ada Ketua Polis Negara akan menangkap saya dan mendakwa saya di mahkamah atas kesalahan menghasut dan jenayah fitnah.

Sekarang ni pun, saya sedang menghadapi empat pertuduhan hasutan dan jenayah fitnah. Dua ataupun tiga pertuduhan lagi, apa salahnya? Ye tak? Sama ada saya dipenjarakan ataupun tidak, tu bukan soalnya. Apa yang penting adalah dunia perlu diberitahu bahawa mereka sekali lagi cuba memalsukan bukti terhadap Anwar Ibrahim. Kalau saya terpaksa masuk penjara pun, gasaklah.

ARTIKEL DI ATAS DITERBITKAN PADA 21 JULAI 2008. TAK LAMA SELEPAS TU, SAYA DIPANGGIL KE BUKIT AMAN KERANA MEREKA INGIN ‘MENGAMBIL KETERANGAN SAYA’ ATAS TUDUHAN MENGHASUT. SAYA ENGGAN MEMBERIKAN KETERANGAN. MAKA POLIS TERPAKSA MEMBEBASKAN SAYA. MEREKA KEMUDIANNYA MENGGELEDAH RUMAH SAYA BAGI MENCARI LAPORAN DOKTOR YANG BERKENAAN DAN MERAMPAS PELBAGAI DOKUMEN. WALAU BAGAIMANAPUN, MEREKA GAGAL MENCARI KOMPUTER SAYA, SEKALIPUN MEREKA MENGGELEDAH SELURUH RUMAH SAYA. TAK SAMPAI DUA BULAN KEMUDIAN, SAYA DITAHAN DI BAWAH AKTA KESELAMATAN DALAM NEGERI.