The Rosli Dahlan Trial gets a new Judge in the 11th Hour!
The uncanny similarities in the Trials of Anwar Ibrahim and Rosli Dahlan
Din Merican
By contrast, Lawyer Rosli’s trial is being blacked out because he is just a professional lawyer who got snared in a conspiracy to remove the director CCID, Dato Ramli Yusuff, who was about to expose IGP Musa Hassan’s complicity with the underworld.
Rosli was brought down because he defied A-G Gani who wanted to release a known criminal Goh Cheng Poh @ Tengku Goh and close the case involving MAS’s RM 8 billion losses caused by its former chairman Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli. It has now become necessary to mothball Rosli’s case into oblivion because the MACC witnesses and DPPs are now badly bashed and exposed in court as law enforcement officers who abused their powers. That the MACC is an agency that has gone rotten at its very inception is amplified by the tragedy that befell Teoh Beng Hock who, like Rosli, was just another witness, only that former ended up dead!
The case against Anwar and that of Rosli are as far apart and as unconnected as can be. Or is it? As I compared my notes on the trials of Anwar and Rosli which are taking place almost at the same time in different court rooms of the same Jalan Duta Courts Complex, I was astounded by the similarities between the two.
From the start, Anwar insisted that the present sodomy charge against him is a frame up by the Barisan National Government using IGP Musa Hassan and A-G Gani. Anwar swore he will fight this to the end. Rosli too insists that he has been fixed up by IGP Musa Hassan and A-G Gani by using the MACC. This fact seems very clear since all of the MACC witnesses have now admitted that Rosli was never a suspect for any offence. He was merely needed as a witness. Since the day he was charged, Rosli had maintained that he was a victim of a conspiracy against his client. Apparently, Rosli had been advised to make a written representation to A-G Gani to seek a withdrawal of the charge. But Rosli, like Anwar, is also a proud Leo, and has refused to be seen as begging and grovelling to a scumbag like Gani Patail. Rosli’s fight to expose this trumped up charge deserves public attention especially since the MACC is now being stripped naked in court.
The accusers in both cases are named Saiful. In Anwar’s case it is Saiful Bukhari whereas the MACC IO who lodged the report against Rosli is Saiful Ezral. In Anwar’s case, a faggot alleged Anwar buggered him. In Rosli’s case, the faggot DPP Kevin Morais lied countlessly in order to cover up his lies (see my earlier article: The Liar Kevin Morais Buried In His Lies!).
Musa Hassan (the Mattress Carrier) and Gani Patail fabricated evidence against Anwar in Sodomy I and had mercuric promotions after that to give them the powers to now orchestrate Sodomy II. These same culprits are the hidden hands in the conspiracy against Dato’ Ramli Yusuff and the false charge against Rosli.
Anwar was at one time the President of the International Islamic University (IIU). Rosli was the first batch of law graduates from IIU, and probably received his graduation scroll from Anwar.
The prosecution team against Anwar included senior DPP Nordin Hassan who was also a graduate of IIU. Nordin had a mercuric rise after Sodomy I and is now also part of the prosecution team in Sodomy II. In Rosli’s case, Dato’ Nordin Hasssan, since then promoted as Director of Prosecution MACC, was the hidden hand behind Kevin Morais’ actions. In fact the DPPs prosecuting Rosli namely DPP Dzulqarnain and DPP Sophian are also IIU graduates, both of them many years Rosli’s junior. Perhaps they learned from their senior, Nordin Hassan who prosecuted the IIU President and received fast track promotions and became a Dato’.
People like Nordin Hassan, Dzulqarnain and Sophian would do whatever that is necessary to please their bosses regardless that they sell out their comrade or brother in Islam. They are no different from graduates of the other secular universities when it comes to jockeying for positions and promotions. It mattered little to them that their actions betrayed the principles of “Am’r Maaruf, Nahy Mungkar” (Encourage good, discourage wrongdoing) that they were taught in IIU. That was just a slogan to them. It is little wonder that the Muslim world is so fraught in strife!
