Good Lord, a suicide note from Teoh Beng Hock!
By Richard Loh (Malaysia Chronicle)
Why waste public funds and the hundreds of man-hours spent on the inquest of Teoh Beng Hock’s death?
The AG is such a powerful man he can order the case shut by just stamping ‘NFA’ on the file. Or does the AG want to show Malaysians and the world how our justice system can be toyed with by the powerful as and when they like – even to the extent of their capability to cover-up murders?
I must admit that there is no time limit for evidences to surface even if a case is closed and should it warrant, the case can be re-opened. Likewise for the murder of Altantuya, even though the murderers have been found guilty and sentenced to death, should new evidence surface to show another person or the mastermind who was behind the murder, that person can still be charged.
In Teoh Beng Hock’s case, it looks suspicious when a new piece of evidence, widely believed to be a suicide note was found inside the deceased’s sling bag. The press statement from the AG’s Chamber regarding this new found evidence does nothing more than to show how sloppy the investigation was carried out right from the initial stage. There is heavy suspicion of fabricated evidence being planted.
You can read the full press statement here.
Let us take a look at what the AG statement claimed: In italic is the AG statement and my rebuttal in normal font.
“The Attorney-General Chambers was informed of the discovery of the note by the Investigating Officer, ASP Ahmad Nazri bin Zainal on 7.10.09 some two over months after Teoh Beng Hock’s death. According to the Investigation Officer it was not found when he first searched the deceased’s sling bag after the incident.”
Can you see how desperate they are to fabricate evidence by saying something that stupid to try and convince you “it was not found when he first searched the deceased’s sling bag after the incident”. They did search the sling bag after the incident but the ‘supposed’ suicide note was not there. Yet after two months, they managed to discover it.
From a layman’s understanding, after the police, MACC, AG, the forensic and hospital had fully completed their investigation, all personal belongings of the deceased should have been itemised, tagged and recorded after a thorough search. Those items that required to be produced as evidence will be retained under locked and key while the rest should be returned to the family members.
