Hisham ducks the issue of black-market arms deals

ARCHIVES 2010

By admin-s On Dec 3, 2010

By uppercaise

The Home Minister, trying to brush aside questions on Wikileaks and the clandestine Iran arms trade, has added a twist to the matter by claiming it to be “a new issue” that must be discussed among officials. He’s wrong. Gun-running is an old, old issue.

It’s as old as the Moro rebellion in the southern Philippines; as old as the Palestinian struggle; and as old as the Pattani succession movement in southern Thailand. In fact it’s as old as piracy in the waters of the South-east Asian archipelago.

On the world security agenda today are the two biggest forms of gun-running: nuclear proliferation (the development of nuclear weapons) and the development of offensive ballistic missile capabilities.

You can’t get guns bigger than a ballistic missile and a nuclear bomb.

Iran and North Korea have both been strongly suspected of developing nuclear weapons as well as offensive missiles; the latest Cablegate leaks of US diplomatic cables have shown the depth of concern and anger in many countries with Iran’s ambitions.

Yet companies based in Malaysia have been entangled in the nuclear arms and military black markets for quite a while, and Malaysian facilities used to further this dangerous business.

Raja Petra wrote a three-part series on BSA Tahir and Scomi

Public awareness has only slowly increased in the six years since the Scomi group was exposed as having manufactured and shipped to Libya components to be used in centrifuges for enriching uranium, the nuclear fuel for power plants as well as nuclear weapons.

Since then, US arrests of Iranian arms dealers has exposed the use of Malaysian and Malaysian-based front companies, freight forwarders, and KL International Airport as a transshipment point.

Institute of Strategic Studies on Scomi’s role

A research group in the US has said Malaysia is favoured by Iranian arms dealers because of the lack of export controls — particularly laxity over the use of false end-user certificates, which determines whether arms can be shipped under international law.

None of that is “new”, except perhaps among those in the Malaysian public who faithfully swallow a diet of rah-rah feel-good government press releases. The only difference is that perhaps public interest is now being aroused by the fuss over the latest Wikileaks exposures.

A research study last year criticised Malaysia

But what has the Malaysian government done about illegal arms trading since Scomi six years ago?

On Thursday, Hishammuddin, the home minister, said he would await a briefing by federal police headquarters, and consultation with foreign diplomatic partners and intelligence agencies.

“On cross borders matters like this, we need to involve Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) and Wisma Putra (Foreign Ministry) in terms of our (foreign policies) concerning our bilateral and multilateral ties (with foreign countries),” Malaysiakini quotes Hishammuddin as saying to reporters at Parliament.

“There are Malaysian companies involved, but I cannot say unless I discuss with relevant parties first. It is a new issue and the effect is serious, let us handle this in the proper way and work with the relevant parties.”

It is difficult to believe that Hishammudin could say that with a straight face, considering the background facts.