Jais can’t hide behind spurious logic
Bob Teoh, The Micah Mandate
Jais cannot hide behind its spurious actions and be exonerated from its controversial intrusion into a charity dinner held at a church recently. It must be held accountable for its actions because it strikes at the very heart of criminal jurisprudence, law enforcement, and administration of justice; Islamic or otherwise.
Jais cannot resort to “lempar batu sembunyi tangan” – being the hidden hand behind a spurious act and allowed to get away with it through flawed reasoning.
Its actions are spurious simply because they are not what it purports to be. Its line of reasoning may be apparently valid but not factually so.
Did Jais know what it did was wrong? If it did, then this alone can be indicted as a criminal offence. Jais has turned the table on itself – the law enforcer becomes the offender.
In what appeared to be a vigilante action, Jais, or the Selangor Islamic Department, descended upon a charity function held at the Damansara Utama Methodist Church without invitation, permission or due authority on 3 August.
While the media described this as a raid, Jais claimed it was a search. The problem is it did not have a search warrant. Conducting a search without a warrant or an order from the court is considered an extra-judicial action. Is Jais, therefore, exempt from due process? And if so, why so?
Having exposed itself as the hidden hand that threw the proverbial stone, Jais resorted to more spurious actions. It hastily assembled a preliminary report to justify its action. That report found its way into Youtube and blogs complete with video streams of twelve Muslims found at the dinner that night together with their full names and identification numbers and photos. How did that report get onto the internet when it is obviously privy to only few top Jais officers?
Following the sinister publication of the report, the twelve have been feathered and tarred as apostates without much hope of redeeming themselves. This is gross travesty of justice as it violates every rule of natural justice and that of a fair trial in the event that they are called to defend themselves later. This is nothing less than a miscarriage of justice.
To compound their predicament further, the twelve are now directed to undergo counseling by Jais to “restore their faith and belief in the religion of Islam”.
What is intriguing is that it now appears that whatever evidence Jais purported it had was not even sufficient to press charges against the alleged offending parties. It now appears that Jais didn’t have prima facie evidence. It was fishing for evidence in that raid but in vain.
Strangely enough the Selangor executive councillor in charge of Islamic affairs, Hasan Ali, was quick to jump to the defence of Jais immediately following the uproar over the raid. But in the first place, as the state minister in charge of Islamic affairs, how come he was not keep informed of the raid?
