‘I am not anti-government’
After 55 years under Umno-BN, Malaysians are unable to distinguish between party and government, forgetting that when an opposition rules a state it is no longer ‘the opposition’ but the ‘ruling coalition’.
I make no secrets of my political affiliation. I am proud and unashamedly an active member of the DAP. I believe in what the party does and in its plans for our nation, where every citizen is treated fairly regardless of race, language or creed. Does this mean by any stretch of the imagination that I believe the DAP is perfect? Certainly not. No political party can claim to be free from corruption, cronyism or favouritism.
Douglas Tan, Free Malaysia Today
It has been a while since I wrote a piece and yes, there have been plenty of issues on the political front since the Chinese New Year.
There was the federal minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil’s leave of absence to “facilitate” the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s investigation into the National Feedlot Corporation scandal which involved her family and the MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek saying that the Chinese owe their prosperity to Barisan Nasional.
Then there was also Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali handing out ‘pak kam” (white envelope) as ang pows to elderly folk, the 1Care issue and the “epic” debate between Chua and DAP secretary- general Lim Guan Eng.
Despite all these juicy topics, I have not felt inclined to write. I’m sure that my colleagues in the online media world have done a brilliant job.
But there is something that has been bugging me since I began writing as a columnist while t also campaigning actively for the opposition, and in particular, the DAP.
I am frequently asked why many young people (me included) are so anti-government, and so intent on causing trouble and instability.
I believe that is a fair question which deserves a fair explanation.
‘DAP evangelist’
I make no secrets of my political affiliation. I am proud and unashamedly an active member of the DAP. I believe in what the party does and in its plans for our nation, where every citizen is treated fairly regardless of race, language or creed.
Does this mean by any stretch of the imagination that I believe the DAP is perfect? Certainly not. No political party can claim to be free from corruption, cronyism or favouritism.
However, the concern would be the severity of these political vices and whether it would severely impact the ability to govern a nation effectively.
When I wrote on the DAP national convention, I was roundly criticised by fellow writer Helen Ang who accused me of being an “evangelis DAP” (evangelist for the DAP) and also condemned me for my faith.
She wrote that people like me spew out an extremely one-sided and unbalanced view and that our country would descend into Nazism and communist dictatorship if left unchecked.
Despite finding her article to be generally offensive, I could not help but laugh at the irony of her comments.
I did not respond initially as I did not believe that I should dignify her comments with a response. But I would like to make a point that the reason why I think and write this way is that I have intimately seen both sides of the coin and formed my own conclusion.
Justified bias?
Was I biased when I wrote my article on the DAP national convention? Of course I was. Was it one-sided? Most definitely.
Why did I do this? The reason is simple. Politics is perception. Journalists are supposed to frame up the truth in a manner which is supposed to be even-handed and impartial.
The fact of the matter is that we are human. We would tend to favour one side over the other. Is this correct? In an ideal world, perhaps not, but we do not live in an ideal world.
In the world of the free press, differing opinions of political events offer the reader a variety of view points and allows the individual to make up their own mind on the matter.
In the United Kingdom, The Guardian is a well-known conservative paper, The Times is more politically centred and The Daily Mail is unabashedly right-wing.
How does this compare to our situation here in Malaysia?
The Star is the mouthpiece of the MCA, and the New Straits Times is so blatantly pro-Umno it has to be given away free to schools and hospitals.
Then there is the blatantly divisive Utusan Malaysia and the Metro Harian which carry opinions derived from Bernama. The only semblance of favourable reporting towards the opposition parties come from the Chinese press including the China Press and Sin Chew.
But even then, the political leaning would always be more towards BN.
So how about The Rocket, Harakah Daily, Suara Keadilan, Malaysia Today, Malaysiakini, Free Malaysia Today, The Malaysian Insider and Malaysia Chronicle?
As party newspapers and online news portals, do they even attempt to offer a balanced point of view? Or is our desire for free media driven to the extent that it would appear that we have to write articles to the other extreme?
Is this necessarily in order for opposing view points to meet in the middle in the mind of the reader?
Anti-government rhetoric?
The fact of the matter is that in the arena of press and broadcast media, it is simply not fair.
The opposition’s only saving grace is the Internet for the dissemination of information.
Despite the argument for a fair media, is the opposition and pro-opposition journalists like myself guilty of disseminating misinformation? To a certain extent, yes we are all guilty of this.
Does this make us anti-government? No, it does not.
Today, after 55 years under a Umno-Barisan Nasional government, Malaysians are unable to distinguish between the BN party and the government.
As such, we cannot really be blamed for saying things like “the opposition control Penang, Kelatan, Kedah and Selangor”.
As a matter of fact, this statement is fundamentally wrong. When the opposition becomes a state-government, it is no longer the opposition, but the ruling coalition.
This idea is incredibly difficult to grasp, as Malaysia, like Singapore, is an example of an extremely successful pseudo-democratic system.
The reason behind this is that no other party or coalition has ever governed these countries in their short histories.
Furthermore, Umno-BN hold the Guinness World Record for being the longest serving party or coalition in any country which calls itself a democracy.
This is not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but it throws up serious questions of accountability.
