Sugumar’s family rejects inquest, calls for murder investigation
An inquest under section 328 of the Criminal Procedure Code is only necessary where there is serious doubt as to the cause of death. An inquest is not a substitute for a proper criminal investigation. Why call for an inquest when there is adequate evidence to bring a criminal prosecution for murder?
N Surendran, Latheefa Koya
We refer to the statement by Selangor police deputy chief Datuk Thaiveegan on 27 January 2013 that an inquest will be held into the death of C.Sugumar in police custody. The family of C.Sugumar absolutely rejects an inquest into Sugumar’s death. Instead, the family again calls for the arrest, investigation and prosecution of all police personnel involved on murder charges under section 302 of the Penal Code. An inquest under section 328 of the Criminal Procedure Code is only necessary where there is serious doubt as to the cause of death. An inquest is not a substitute for a proper criminal investigation. Why call for an inquest when there is adequate evidence to bring a criminal prosecution for murder? In this case there are eyewitnesses who have come forward to say that Sugumar was chased down, handcuffed, smeared with turmeric and beaten to death by police personnel. This should have resulted in an immediate classification of the case under s.302 Penal Code; the calling of a mere inquest is inconsistent with the available evidence.