The missing man in the Altantuyaa story
KTemoc Konsiders
I am very attracted to the FMT news article Deepak: PI Bala and I on the same team where Deepak aims, together with brave Perumal Balasubramaniam, to reveal the “truth” behind the 2006 murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu.
After all, they are the new G-Ds of “truth” as I had posted in Age of Gemini?
We gather the two new G-Ds of “truth” will team up like the Ashwini Kumaras who incidentally were doctors to other gods, and from that Hindu belief we may presume they could “doctor” stuff for a healthier life for other G-Ds. Marvellous.
But why leave the G-D team members at only two. More should be better where they could then be like the League of Super-Heroes.
If I’m not mistaken, what had led the world’s most courageous private investigator into issuing his famous or notorious (take your pick) statutory declaration (SD), which coincidentally during a period of allegations of sodomy alleged Najib Razak did it to Altantuyaa in her behind with the late Mongolian expressing her delight at that (all according to Perumal Balasubramaniam’s 1st SD), …
… started in Fogles pub and then The Backyard pub in Sri Hartamas when Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu, Balasubramaniam, ASP Suresh, Puravalen (another lawyer) were having a few drinks and discussing the Altantuyaa case.
They were coincidentally joined by none other than Sivarasa Rasiah who coincidentally was/is a PKR MP.
Apparently after hearing what Balasubramaniam had to offer, regarding what he was informed by Razak Baginda who in turn was informed by Najib Razak who in turn was informed by Altantuyaa Shariibuu who in turn confessed she liked ‘getting it’ in her behind, Sivarasa (remember, he’s coincidentally the PKR MP) ‘suggested’ that Balasubramaniam get ‘someone’ neutral to record everything down. What a wonderful suggestion!
And coincidentally, that neutral ‘someone was Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu. In fact it had been Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu who assured us that he was nominated because he was coincidentally the one lawyer who did not have an agenda in this matter (presumably the Altantuuyaa case).
I recall Sivarasa was coincidentally(?) at the press conference when Balasubramnaiam revealed his 1st SD, sitting just beside Anwar Ibrahim who coincidentally was there to grace the press conference.
And if you are thinking of blaming Anwar or suggesting he had something to do with Balasubramniam;s SD, please don’t bother because coincidentally Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu had ‘cleared’ Anwar Ibrahim from that.
If I recall, it was on 26 Nov 2009 that we read Malaysiakini’s PI’s lawyer: ‘Anwar not behind Bala tapes’ which led me to post Bala’s SD – Americk Sidhu clears Anwar Ibrahim from involvement.
Malaysia’s very civic-minded Mr ‘Neutral’ asserted that:
“… Anwar had nothing to do with the release of the first SD except to deliver a speech prior to the press conference at the PKR headquarters last July. I have had no communication with Anwar at all, and neither has he or any PKR member tried to contact me.”
|
|
|
Americk Singh Sidhu: “Anwar had nothing to do with the release of the 1st SD” |
Then, I was greatly comforted by Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer’s assertion, though I was somewhat puzzled, just a tad though, that despite having no communication with Anwar or any PKR member whatsoever (except of course for an encounter with Sivarasa Rasiah at ‘The Backyard’ pub and Anwar Ibrahim at the press conference) Mr Americk Singh Sidhu was able to further assert: “… Many people think Anwar Ibrahim is behind all this. That is absolutely untrue. Anwar has no idea about this whole episode except what he may have read in the blogs and on Malaysiakini.”
In my post I had commented that I was (coincidentally) in a somewhat similar position as Americk, sharing with him a status where I too coincidentally “…have had no communication with Anwar at all, and neither has he or any PKR member tried to contact me”, indeed wakakaka.
Thus I too would definitely not accuse Anwar Ibrahim of being behind Balasubramaniam’s 1st SD … Absolutely NOT!
But precisely for that very reason, that I was and am not in communication with Anwar wakakaka, I wouldn’t be able to claim whether Anwar was involved or not involved.
|
|
|
You’re allowed 3 guesses as to who’s the person on right |
But strangely but most wonderfully (coincidentally?), Malaysia’s very civic-minded lawyer Americk Singh Sidhu was able to, proving he must be a better man than most, especially me, dungu kaytee.
