Do you want to play poker with me? (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)
Rafizi also did not confirm or deny the meetings between Anwar and Misuari. He just said I lied. Did I lie about the meetings being held (which means there were no meetings) or did I lie about the reason for the meetings and about what was discussed in those meetings? Rafizi did not explain this.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Some readers have challenged me to rebut Americk Sidhu’s allegation against me. I will certainly do that but I am first working on the evidence. Once the evidence is complete, I will reveal what I have.
I also want to give some ‘space’ between P. Balasubramaniam’s death and my revelation because what I reveal may not be too complimentary to the deceased private investigator — nor to his lawyers such as M. Puravalen and R. Sivarasa, for that matter.
I think Americk is going to be shocked to find out what Puravalen and Sivarasa had hidden from him. I personally like Americk and he is a very nice person indeed. However, he can sometimes be a bit naïve about what I would call realpolitik. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik).
Meanwhile, I want to reply to Rafizi Ramli’s statement in the video below (see minute 12.12 of that video). Then view Nur Misuari’s Aljazeera interview, starting from minute 21.15 where he clearly states that Sabah and Sarawak belong to them and that the peace talks with the MILF (brokered by the Malaysian government) is merely aimed at cheating the MNLF of its right over Sabah and Sarawak.
Hence the motive of the recent intrusion into Lahad Datu is very clear. It was meant to ‘stir the sentiments’ of the very large Muslim population in Sabah. And considering that 32 of the 60 state seats in Sabah are Muslim-majority, this can have a bearing on the outcome of the general election. And whomsoever wins Sabah and Sarawak will get to form the next federal government.
First look at this chart.
You can see how over 50 years from 1960 to 2010 the Kadazan-Dusun and Chinese population of Sabah have been reduced by almost half while that of the Muslim population has increased dramatically. Furthermore, the non-Malaysian-citizen population is now about a quarter of the State’s population. Hence one in every four Sabahans is a non-Malaysian citizen — probably the highest ratio in relation to the national average of roughly 10%.
And these non-Malaysians, mostly Filipino Muslims, want Malaysian citizenship. And if that happens then the Muslims in Sabah would make up more than two-thirds of the state’s population — where once Sabah was regarded as a ‘Christian’ state. And these people want autonomy and a new Muslim nation-state comprising of Mindanao (population 25 million, mostly Muslims), Sabah and Sarawak — ‘independent’ of both Malaysia and the Philippines.
To exploit this situation, therefore, is not that difficult. Sentiments, hatred and suspicion are running very high. The only question is: who is the one doing the exploiting? Is it Umno or is it PKR?
Umno has met the Muslim Filipinos and their excuse is that it is their job as mediator (pendamai) to meet the Filipinos. Anwar and other PKR leaders have also met the Filipinos. But they have not told us why.
According to the intelligence reports, the reason Anwar met the Filipinos is as I had reported in my article: The untold story of the Lahad Datu incident (SEE HERE). Rafizi says that this is a lie. However, in his press conference, he did not explain that if I had lied then what was the reason Anwar met Nur Misuari?
Nur Misuari made it very clear. They want back Sabah and Sarawak, which he claims belong to them. Was this discussed in the meeting between Anwar and Nur Misuari?
Rafizi also did not confirm or deny the meetings between Anwar and Misuari. He just said I lied. Did I lie about the meetings being held (which means there were no meetings) or did I lie about the reason for the meetings and about what was discussed in those meetings? Rafizi did not explain this.
I already gave the date and place of both the first and second meetings. I also revealed that an Indonesian Member of Parliament had arranged the meetings at the behest of Anwar himself. Would Rafizi now like me to reveal the name of that Member of Parliament?
I can if he so wishes but I would not want to be the cause of a diplomatic row between Malaysia and Indonesia. Hence I do not want to embarrass the two governments by revealing the name of that Member of Parliament. And until either the Malaysian or Indonesian government challenges me to reveal his name, I will keep that card close to my chest for the meantime.
I do not always reveal what I have in my possession. For example, I have video evidence that the story regarding ‘First Lady’ Rosmah Mansor’s so-called RM24 million diamond ring is not entirely true.
Nevertheless, I am keeping that evidence and will not reveal it yet because the Pakatan Rakyat supporters will just accuse me of being bought, doing a U-turn, trying to sabotage Pakatan Rakyat, and so on.
You see, even if that story about Rosmah’s ring is not entirely true, the Pakatan Rakyat people will not want me to reveal the evidence. They want this story to be thought true because this will work in Pakatan Rakyat’s favour. Hence it is better that the not-true story be maintained than the truth be revealed.
Is this honest? Never mind whether it is honest or not. If the truth will hurt Pakatan Rakyat then better we perpetuate a lie or half-truth if that lie or half-truth can help Pakatan Rakyat.
In that sense I am also not honest. I have evidence of the truth and yet I hide this evidence just to help the opposition win the election. However, if someone would like to call my bluff and accuse me of lying, then I would have no choice but to defend myself by revealing the truth. Then don’t scream that I should not do this so close to the election.
The bottom line is: be careful what you wish for. When you challenge me and call me a liar you are forcing me to defend myself. And you might not like what you see as the truth can sometimes hurt.
Rafizi: Raja Petra is telling tales (see minute 12.12)
{youtube}4KDZhJiARv0{/youtube}
SEE ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KDZhJiARv0
Nur Misuari’s recent interview with Aljazeera regarding the Lahad Datu incident (see minute 21.15)
{youtube}vbjsw-iQ6wI{/youtube}
SEE ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbjsw-iQ6wI
*******************************************************
你要跟我玩扑克牌吗？
Rafizi 也没有有承认或否认安华到底有没有见过Nur Misuari。他所说的是“RPK说谎”，那他指的是，我谎称那个会面的存在（意思是说，根本就没有会面那回事），还是说，那个会面是发生了，而我谎称了会面的内容/目的？ Rafizi他没有解释清楚。
原文：Raja Petra Kamarudin
译文：方宙
有些读者挑战我反驳Americk Sidhu对我的指控。你们别担心，我肯定会，但我必须先搜集证据。在我拥有足够证据以后，我才会公告天下。
其实，我也想在Bala之死和我把证据公诸于世之间给各空隙，因为我的证据可能会对刚刚逝世的Bala和他的律师（Puravalen和Sivarasa）不大有利。
我猜想Americk在发现Puravalen和Sivarasa隐瞒有他后，他将会是很惊讶。我自己本身很喜欢Americk，因为他真的是个好人，唯他有时候在面对现实政治会有点天真。（http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik）
与此同时，我想要就Rafizi Ramli在下方影片的言论作出回应（请看影片的12分12秒，然后在看NurMisuari在Aljazeera的访问，在21分15秒他清楚地表示沙巴和砂劳越是属于他们（苏禄）的，而和MILF的和平谈判（马来西亚政府为协调者）则是用来欺骗MNLF就沙巴和砂劳越主权问题上的烟雾弹）。
拿笃事件的动机是显而易见的；它的目的是挑起沙巴庞大穆斯林人口的神经。沙巴60个国席中的32个国席都是多穆斯林选区，它对大选的影响是很大的。所以说称霸沙巴和砂劳越的政党就是即将组织新政府的政党。
让我们来看看下表。
你可以清楚地看到,在1960到2010这五十年里,卡达山和华人的人口比例降了将近50%,而穆斯林人口比例则显著激增。不只如此,非大马公民现在大约占了沙巴人口的25%,换句话说,每4个沙巴人中,就有一个是非马拉西亚人—-相比之下,我国全国的非公民人口比例只有10%。
这些非公民,大多是菲律宾穆斯林,都想成为马来西亚公民。如果他们都如愿以偿的话,那么沙巴,一个曾经被誉为‘基督之州‘的州属,将会有66%的穆斯林人口。必须注意的是,这些人都有想要自组一个穆斯林国家的议程—他们想把棉蘭老島(2500万人口,大为穆斯林), 沙巴,和砂劳越统一且脱离马来西亚和菲律宾的管制。
所以说,如果有心人士要利用这个局面以自利的话,其实一点都不难：这是个尔虞我诈,自身利益为重的局面。现在的问题是, 有心人士到底是谁?是巫统？还是公正党?
巫统曾经以‘我们是调协者‘的名义和那些菲律宾穆斯林会面。安华和公正党领袖也和菲律宾穆斯林会面,但他们到现在为止都没有说出他们这样做的目的/理由是什么。
根据我的情报,安华的目的就是我之前所写的(The untold story of the LahadDatuincident按此)。Rafizi 讲这是个谎言。但是，在他的记者会上，他没有交代说，如果我真的说谎的话，那安华会见Nur Misuari 的目的是什么？
Nur Misuari 已经讲得很清楚了，他要‘收回’ 沙巴和砂劳越。这是否是他和安华会面的主题呢？
Rafizi 也没有有承认或否认安华到底有没有见过Nur Misuari。他所说的是“RPK说谎”，那他指的是，我谎称那个会面的存在（意思是说，根本就没有会面那回事），还是说，那个会面是发生了，而我谎称了会面的内容/目的？ Rafizi他没有解释清楚。
我把第一次和第二次会面的时间和地点都讲得很清楚，我也揭露是一个印尼的国会议员在安华的指令下安排这个会面的。Rafizi是否要我讲出那个印尼议员的名字呢？
如果Rafizi要我说的话，我绝对可以，但我不想成为马印两国外交争吵的起端。我不想因为给了那个名字而羞辱马印两国政府。所以如果他挑战我的话，我目前会把那张皇牌捉紧。
我并不会公开我所有的证据。举个例子，关于‘第一夫人’罗斯玛2400万钻石戒指的指控，我就有影片证明那个指控是不完全正确的。
但是，我是不会公开那证据的，因为民联支持者只会骂我，讲我被收买，U转了，破坏民联。。。。等。
所以你看，即使罗斯玛戒指案是不正确的，民联是不会要我摆出证据的。他们要大众相信他们的版本，因为这样对他们有利。所以对他们来说，谎言会好过真相。
这成实吗？不重要吧。如果真相会对民联不利的话，那我们说谎也是对的！
这样推断下来，我也是不诚实的。我有确凿的证据，但我现在却把它给隐藏起来了以便反对党能够赢得即将的大选。但是，如果有人够胆说我讲骗话的话，我唯只有公开证据以示清白。到时，请别在那大喊大叫，说我不应该在离大选这么近时做出那种事。
总归一句，小心你想要得到的东西。当你挑战我，讲我是个骗子时，我必须得保护自己。你可能会看到你不想看得到的东西，因为真相有时是很伤人的。
