One year anniversary of RM557 million!
Lim Sian See
It is one year after the largest amount in damages ever awarded in Malaysian judicial history – against current PKR ADUN and PKR Sabah Deputy Chairperson Christina Liew.
She was found guilty cheating 819 poor families out of their only valuable asset (their land) by using her staff to pretend to be the buyer while she convinces the poor landowners to sell cheaply so that they can make hundreds of millions!
One year until today, this news remains buried in FMT (mine is the only comment) and never featured in MalaysiaKini and Malaysian Inciter or their friendly FB pages and blogs.
It’s only the largest damages ever officially awarded by a court in Malaysia’s history – nothing special. No need for them to report!
Pakatan leaders keep asking people not to read mainstream media – a case of “Don’t listen to their bullshit and lies, listen to our bullshit and lies instead”.
And once you listen ONLY to their bullshit and lies, they continually manipulate and use you.
Thus the majority of Pakatan supporters are totally unaware and shocked at this news of the largest court-case awarded damages – against a Pakatan YB for cheating 819 poor families.
If this was a BN MP or ADUN, this news would probably still been headlines on MalaysiaKini and Malaysian Insider.
Largest court-awarded damages ever and never reported by so-called “independent portals. You must be kidding!
—————————————–
The High Court of Sabah and Sarawak has awarded RM557, 641,716.29 in damages against three individuals: Api Api ADUN and lawyer Christina Liew Chin Jin Hadhikusumo, the 3rd Defendant in a land case; the 1st Defendant Siti Rahfizah Mihaldin who is Liew’s clerk; and the 2nd Defendant Samsuri Baharudin, the purported attorney of a group of 819 smallholders.
The High Court found that the three Defendants had unlawfully induced the Bahagak Smallholders Scheme participants to breach their JVA on 12,000 acres with the company, Borneo Samudera Sdn Bhd (BSSB).
This is what the judge Chew Soo Ho said:
“it is abundantly clear that the 1st and 2nd Defendants (Christina’s staff) are going for the smallholders lots which the 3rd Defendant (Christina) had been directly involved with the 1st and 2nd Defendant to buy up the smallholders’ lots”
The benefit that the Defendants will obtain and enjoy in purchasing and acquiring the smallholders’ lots which had been developed into oil palm plantation is easily inferred as such developed land is insurmountable in value or land price when they are resold, said the Judge.
—————————————————–
The case is still in appeal. Listen to YB Christina’s own lawyers confirming this:http://sabahkini.com/
The YB was also shocked by the news report stating that most of the smallholders had lodged a police report against her and the other two defendants, when it was not part of the reason for the decision and the finding of the Judge.
