Tony Pua is beginning to sound like an imbecile

By MT Webmaster Last updated Jan 19, 2016

Why is Tony still a member of the PAC and why has he not resigned yet? Is it because the PAC cannot be accused of a cover up and of hiding the truth? It is now time for Tony to explain himself or else he would be seen as a fooking imbecile. You do not continue to sit in a corrupt committee (if Tony does think that the PAC is corrupt).

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

(Free Malaysia Today) – Arul Kanda Kandasamy has failed Malaysians because he has failed to provide the answers to the many questions arising from the 1MDB scandal, despite him clearly having access to the truth as the company’s CEO, said Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua in a statement.

Arul Kanda, he alleged, has refused to tell the truth on the USD700 million paid to the Jho Low-controlled Good Star Limited. “He has refused to come clean on USD993 million from Cayman Islands and the USD975 million from Deutsche Bank-led consortium used to compensate Aabar Investments PJS for the options.”

“He has even refused to explain to Malaysians if 1MDB paid money to a fraudulent Aabar Investment PJS Limited established in British Virgin Island, unrelated to the real Aabar Investment PJS of Abu Dhabi, as exposed by The Wall Street Journal.”

Instead of blaming the Opposition, added Pua who is also DAP National Publicity Secretary, Arul Kanda should reflect on how his actions have been designed to allow “the thieves to get away with the heist of the century”.

Pua was commenting on Arul Kanda’s interview with the New Straits Times, during which the latter reportedly said the state-owned company that he leads could have obtained better deals on the sale of its assets had not the Opposition scared investors away.

************************************************

Tony Pua is either losing his marbles or he was always an imbecile to start with. He, and Rafizi Ramli as well, should stop barking because they can no longer see the trees for the forest. This is the problem when you focus on the brush strokes instead of the tapestry.

This only goes to prove that Tony has a myopic mind. And I would expect a so-called national politician to be better than this. Apparently Tony is no better than a kampung politician who looks at things with blinkers over their eyes. And if this is the best that DAP can offer then I shudder to think that one day we might have them running the country. This is going to push Malaysia back to the era of China of the First World War period.

Does Tony think that Arul Kanda Kandasamy was employed as 1MDB’s President and CEO a year ago so that he can kowtow to Tony Pua’s every whim and fancy and serve at the pleasure of Tony Pua? Arul is not Tony’s servant who must jump at his every command and satisfy whatever lust that he may have.

Arul was employed to do a job and that is all he needs to do. And Arul’s terms of employment does not include listening to Tony Pua and jump at his every command. Tony is not paying Arul’s salary. 1MDB is. And 1MDB has given Arul a specific job to do.

Tony is forgetting himself. Somehow he imagines himself as Arul’s boss. Arul must listen to him and do what he says. Tony is in charge and Arul must obey him and only him. The Prime Minister, the Cabinet, the 1MDB Board, etc., have no say in the matter. Only what Tony wants matters.

What was the main complaint regarding 1MDB back in December 2014? It was that 1MDB had too much debts and not enough cash flow. So, the following month, in January 2015, Arul was employed to rectify this problem. In short, Arul needed to turn around 1MDB through a rationalisation and debt-reduction exercise.

Arul spent almost six months scrutinising the affairs of 1MDB and to come out with a rationalisation and debt-reduction plan. He did just that and presented the plan to the Cabinet, which the Cabinet approved. Arul asked for six months to achieve that — what should have taken two or three years in ‘normal’ cases.

So what was it that Arul presented to the Cabinet, and which the Cabinet approved? Does Tony know? Or he does not care? And did Arul achieve that? Does Tony know? Or he does not care?

Arul was given a job to do. The question is: did he succeed in that job? And was part of this job to layan Tony Pua and make sure that Tony is satisfied and that all his questions are answered? Tony Pua may be a Member of Parliament but that does not give him carte blanche over 1MDB.

Tony is just like a one-trick pony. The only trick that he knows is to harass Arul and 1MDB. Other than that Tony knows no other tricks. And this is the man who is going to be the new Finance Minister if the DAP-led Pakatan Harapan takes over the federal government.

Tony feels he is the next best Chinese Finance Minister after Tun Tan Siew Sin. No way Jose! Tony cannot even get a job as Siew Sin’s bag carrier. Siew Sin was a Towering Chinese. Tony is a Cowering Chinese. One small difference in the alphabet makes a world of difference in the stature of the two men we are comparing.

Let me make that very clear again. Arul does not work for Tony. He does not report to Tony. His salary is not paid by Tony. Arul can easily tell Tony to go fook himself.

What is Arul’s job? And has he done his job? And if the answer is ‘yes’ then that is the end of the matter. Whether Tony is satisfied or not is not part of that job specs. And the faster Tony gets that into his thick skull the better for everyone who have to endure his moaning, groaning, bitching, grumbling and complaining.

Tony is a member of the PAC. Did he ask all his questions during the PAC meeting? Is that not the correct platform to pose his questions? And if Tony did ask his questions and if Arul did not reply why is Tony the only one moaning, groaning, bitching, grumbling and complaining while all the other (opposition) members of the PAC are not making a fool of themselves like Tony is?

Is the PAC (the other opposition members included) a party to a cover up? Are they (the other opposition members included) trying to hide the truth? Have all the members of the PAC (the other opposition members included), other than just Tony, been bought off?

If I were a member of the PAC and if all the other members of the PAC (the opposition members included) have been bought off and are a party to hiding the truth, I would resign in protest and would no longer want to be involved in the crime of misleading the public.

So tell me, Tony, is the PAC corrupt, and is that why you need to keep barking outside the PAC? It is now your turn to answer our question.

Raja Petra Kamarudin RPK