Pakatan: putting the lunatics in charge of the asylum

Pakatan Harapan people are totally devoid of logic and common sense. They will argue that it is okay to break the law as long as it is for a good cause. A crime is a crime only if someone from Barisan Nasional does it but not if someone from Pakatan Harapan does it. And they hide behind Parliamentary privileges to commit crimes.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Putting Pakatan Harapan in charge of running the country is akin to putting the lunatics in charge of the asylum. Pakatan Harapan has demonstrated time and time again that their leaders, supporters and followers are a bunch of idiots.

Why do I say Pakatan Harapan leaders, supporters and followers are a bunch of idiots? Well, there are many examples to support my prognosis. Mainly they all involve irrational thinking and behaviour and their inability to apply common sense to come to a sensible conclusion. In short, they are a bunch of morons and I hate morons worse than I hate racist DAP Chinese and their Red Bean Army cyber-troopers.

Take one example. There are those who are upset with me because, according to them, I no longer support Pakatan Harapan. So they call me a traitor and a turncoat and all sorts of other nasty names.

No longer support Pakatan Harapan? WTF! Let me make this very clear. I never supported Pakatan Harapan since the day it was formed. Maybe I did support Pakatan Rakyat. But that was in 2008 when PAS was part of Pakatan Rakyat. So I supported Pakatan Rakyat because of PAS, not because of DAP.

Now, however, DAP kicked PAS out of the opposition coalition. And the opposition coalition is no longer Pakatan Rakyat but a DAP-led Pakatan Harapan. And DAP also created another so-called Islamic party, PAN, hoping that PAN would take away 20% or at least 200,000 PAS members. But all they got was 20,000 or 2%, which has upset Lim Kit Siang who wanted PAN to kill PAS.

So, let me repeat that I never supported Pakatan Harapan from the very first day. I did, however, support PAS since the day its President, Abdul Hadi Awang, returned to Malaysia after his studies in the Middle East. That was 40 years ago and I still support PAS till today. So only idiots would say I have done u-turn or have become a traitor or turncoat because I no longer support Pakatan Harapan, a party I never supported from day one.

So, tell me, why would I want to support a group of people who are idiots and help them get into power when it would be like putting the lunatics in charge of the asylum? I would like to believe that I am smarter and more intelligent than the regular Pakatun. Only idiots would want idiots to lead them and I am no idiot, trust me on that one.

Pakatuns also have this misguided principle that it is okay to break the law as long as you are doing it for a good cause. Rafizi Ramli breaks the law. Tony Pua breaks the law. Maria Chin breaks the law. Anwar Ibrahim breaks the law. Tian Chua breaks the law. Mat Sabu breaks the law. Everybody who is anybody in Pakatan Harapan breaks the law. But that is okay because they are doing it for a good cause.

And if they break the law while in Parliament that is even more okay because they have what they call Parliamentary privileges. That means they can call your mother a whore and you can do nothing to them because they are doing this in Parliament.

Would it be okay for a Member of Parliament to say that Malaysia needs another May 13 so that Chinese blood can spill on the streets of Kuala Lumpur? Of course you will say that that is not okay because the statement is seditious. Why is it seditious? Do we not have Parliamentary privileges? In fact, can we commit murder in Parliament and say we are protected by Parliamentary privileges so the police cannot arrest us?

Yes, you will scream Parliamentary privileges when someone from Pakatan Harapan breaks the law but you will not tolerate something like that if someone from Barisan Nasional does it.

Rafizi Ramli and Tony Pua reveal information that is protected by the OSA. That is breaking the law if someone else does it but not if Rafizi Ramli and Tony Pua do it because they are from Pakatan Harapan so they have Parliamentary privileges. And even if they do it outside Parliament and during a ceramah that is also okay, even if they are breaking the law, because they are doing it with good intentions. Hence you can break the law as long as it is with good intentions.

A certain Sultan whacked a caddy on the head and killed him but he had good intentions for doing that: he was tying to educate the caddy to become a better caddy. Hence it is not murder since it was with good intentions like what Rafizi Ramli and Tony Pua normally do.

Maria Chin may have broken the law but it was with good intentions. So she should not be arrested. Jamal Yunos, however, although he did the same thing as Maria, did not have good intentions. So he must be arrested. How do you differentiate between good intentions and bad intentions? Good intentions means you support Pakatan Harapan while bad intentions means you support Barisan Nasional.

Now tell me again. Do you people really want to put these types of people in charge of the country? And, more important than that, do you really think I am stupid to support these types of people? Only lembu will follow other lembu. Is that not what the new de facto opposition leader, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, said? Check out what Mahathir said about herd mentality.

Anwar may have sodomised many young men and boys but that is okay because he is trying to save Malaysia. Mahathir may have lost RM100 billion due to his bad economic decisions and ripped off another RM100 billion personally which he parked under trustees, nominees, proxies and cronies but that is okay because he is trying to save Malaysia.

Mahathir goes round slandering Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and accuses him of all sorts of things without supporting these allegations with any evidence. This is a violation of the law and Mahathir should be put in jail for a long, long time. But lying and slandering is okay as long as it is for a good cause.

What if the MP for Pasir Salak, Tajuddin Abdul Rahman, exercises his Parliamentary privileges and stands up in Parliament and says that Teresa is the only woman with a Kok? That one cannot. But if Tajuddin wants to stand up in Parliament and insult Rosmah Mansor that is okay. No one is going to protest.

The Pakatan Harapan people break the law every single day but that is for a good cause so they should not be punished. And if the police arrests them the people will march on the streets in protest. Pakatan Harapan people are so stupid they will believe anything you tell them.

DAP says Hadi is trying to table a Hudud Bill in Parliament and people believe that (when it is actually a Sharia Amendment Bill and not a Hudud Bill). DAP says PAS resigned from Pakatan Rakyat and people believe that (when DAP actually closed down Pakatan Rakyat and formed Pakatan Harapan while refusing to allow PAS into the new coalition). DAP says Malaysia is a Secular State and people believe that (when the Constitution does not say that and instead says that Islam is the religion of the Federation). DAP says that Hadi is trying to introduce a dual legal system with his RUU355 and people believe that (whereas Malaysia already had a dual legal system since long before Merdeka or the creation of Malaysia, or the First World War for that matter).

The stupidity of the Pakatuns is so mind-boggling that I just cannot believe it. I thought there is a limit to how stupid people can be but the Pakatuns have set a new world record for stupidity. Honestly, I would rather die than become a Pakatan Harapan supporter. These people must be totally devoid of dignity and honour to claim they are Pakatuns. Trust me on this one but even prostitutes have pride. Prostitutes will never agree to being treated like a dog for any amount of money like the way the Pakatuns would. And I will be insulting dogs if I say that Pakatuns are worse than dogs.