“The second thing he asked was why I supported Dr Mahathir ??” Huh ??


OutSyed The Box

Hi folks, here are two interesting news items. One is very relevant. 
 
 
T. Thomas support for secular state not reason rejected by King, said Dr M
Several other reasons
allegations Thomas represented Guan Eng in corruption case, not impartial AG
Thomas was Lim Guan Eng’s lawyer
Thomas also represented Barisan Nasional leaders.
Dr M  said follow the law
“We do according to law and Federal Constitution
King act on advice of govt he said.
We are holding on to our principles he added.
Article 145 (1) of the Federal Constitution states that “The Yang di-Pertuan Agong shall, on the advice of the Prime Minister, appoint a person who is qualified to be a judge of the Federal Court to be the Attorney-General for the Federation”.
My comments :
That was easy enough to understand.
Tun Dr Mahathir always speaks simply, clearly and precisely.
Everyone can understand what he is saying.
Dont you all agree?
Now here is another news item :
 
 

https://www.themalaysianinsight.com/s/52090

ANWAR Ibrahim said he visited Malay rulers

to debunk notion Pakatan did not respect royal institution

(Huh? Whose notion? Who said Pakatan does not respect royals?)

 

he assured sultans Pakatan not under thumb of Chinese-majority DAP

I told them not to worry because govt not under DAP

 

(Huh? “not to worry”?? In the first place, what is there to worry? Arent DAP also the sultans’  loyal subjects. The DAP are also citizens of Malaysia. They have done a good job in Penang.  Plus PKR, Amanah and PPBM have 71 seats. DAP has only 42 seats. Kipas satay ke brader? DAP better read this carefully.)

 

no attempts to eliminate power of rulers Anwar said at Abim event

My intention clear,  to explain PH govt’s policies said Anwar at Abim HQ

 

(ABIM ? Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia ?? Why ??)

READ MORE HERE

 



Comments
Loading...