Altantuya case – stranger & stranger
KTemoc Konsiders
Be that as it may, Cousin Namiraa Gerelmaa was cross-examination by Razak Baginda’s lawyer Manjeet Singh Dhillon, who said she, as reported, “exaggerated” many details in her current witness statement, including the alleged purchase of submarines by the government.
Both Namiraa and Urintuya [Urintuya Gal-Ochir,a friend, has been another wirness] had testified as witnesses during the Altantuya murder trial in 2007.
Manjeet referred to evidence submitted by Urintuya in the murder trial that Altantuya only talked about coming to Malaysia to meet Razak Baginda, but that there were no other details.
“I put it to you that what Urintuya had said in her statement was all that Altantuya had said about Razak Baginda, nothing more, nothing less,” said the lawyer, to which Namiraa disagreed.
Similarly, senior federal counsel Norinna Bahadun, representing the government, said Namiraa was submitting fresh evidence which “never existed” during the criminal trial, and was “tainted” by various media reports on Altantuya’s death.
To further questions from lawyer Ramkarpal Singh, Namiraa agreed that she had not mentioned these details, including the alleged submarine deal during the criminal trial.
What translation job as no Russian submarine was purchased?