Zakir Naik is just another Superman Hew

The fact that Superman Hew, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, etc., talk about Chinese issues while Ahmed Deedat and Zakir Naik talk about Islamic issues makes no difference. The issues may be different but the style is the same. Just because Ahmed Deedat and Zakir Naik talk about Islamic issues does not mean they need to be ‘gentle’ while Superman Hew, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, and so on can be allowed to be confrontational and abrasive because they talk about Chinese issues.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Dr Zakir Naik is the protege of the late South African preacher, Sheikh Ahmed Deedat. Ahmed Deedat was confrontational and abrasive in the way he debated and he delighted in debating comparative religion. He would constantly be on attack mode and never showed mercy in talking about other religions.

Ahmad Deedat’s, and now Zakir Naik’s, style is no different from that of Superman Hew, Lim Kit Siang, Lim Guan Eng, and a host of other DAP leaders. Superman Hew, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, and all those other DAP leaders would also, in a very confrontational and abrasive manner, attack those seen as DAP’s enemies.

The fact that Superman Hew, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, etc., talk about Chinese issues while Ahmed Deedat and Zakir Naik talk about Islamic issues makes no difference. The issues may be different but the style is the same. Just because Ahmed Deedat and Zakir Naik talk about Islamic issues does not mean they need to be ‘gentle’ while Superman Hew, Kit Siang, Guan Eng, and so on can be allowed to be confrontational and abrasive because they talk about Chinese issues.

Superman Hew is ten times worse than Zakir Naik in the way be debates and puts his arguments across