Lim Guan Eng being hounded. This is revenge politics!
P Ramakrishnan
It is with shock and disbelief that Malaysians learnt this morning that Lim Guan Eng would be charged again with two counts of corruption involving the same proposed deep sea tunnel project on Friday, 11 September 2020.
Apparently, this is the continuation of previous charges involving the same project that was laid on 7 August 2020, followed by two more charges on 10 and 11 of August – three charges within a span of five days!
News about Guan Eng’s forthcoming case on Friday was disclosed by the deputy public prosecutor Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin in the Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur today. This is well and good; it’s official as it should be.
But how do you explain the news that was floated and reported on 3 September 2020 quoting an anonymous source that Guan Eng would be charged for corruption on Monday, 6 September. The mystery surrounding the identity of the source and this report ahead of an official announcement is also mystifying.
On 3 September, Lim Guan Eng asserted that the MACC was lying about its involvement with regard to the Sabah Immigration wanting to ban him from Sabah. This was reported by Malaysiakini at 9.26 am. Then at 5.43 pm in the evening – 8 hours and 17 minutes later – it was reported by Malaysiakini: “Guan Eng to face two more charges on Monday.”
No sooner had Guan Eng asserted that MACC was lying, the rumour that he would be charged with two more accounts of corruption was reported.
Some may wonder whether it was tit for tat. You can’t fault them for thinking so!
The question that I wish to raise is this: If MACC had decided to charge Guan Eng further, why was this decision leaked out to be reported? Was it to cause maximum damage to Guan Eng’s reputation? It was an internal decision, how did it become public?
The second question is this: Could this possibly be revenge politics? The MACC acted so swiftly in spite of the fact that Guan Eng had already been charged on several accounts of corruption just a month ago. Coming on the heels of these corruption charges, it raises the possibility that the MACC must have been in possession of this additional information when Guan Eng was first charged on 7, 10 and 11 August.
One would wonder why these additional facts were not used to frame other charges as well last month. Were these withheld deliberately so that in the subsequent delayed charges as in this instance, a perception could be created that he is corrupt and that more charges may be forthcoming soon enough?
Some might think an attempt has been mounted to create a counterpart to Najib Razak that a corrupt politician with multiple corruption charges exists not only in Barisan Nasional but also in Pakatan Harapan. But there can be no parallel to Guan Eng’s case. There is no money trail; there is no bloated bank account to incriminate him; there is no ostentatious lifestyle to raise any suspicion; there is no tell-tale trail to pin-point guilt.
Many would argue that Guan Eng does not have the Umno DNA to be corrupt, unlike most of the Umno leaders who are facing charges in the court of law. These are the kleptokrats who served themselves instead of the rakyat. These are the thieves who plundered the national coffers. Obviously, Guan Eng does not have the same genes to set him on the path of looting.
There is no doubt that the truth will set him free, if he is judged by men of integrity and high moral standing.
It is said that when injustice becomes law, resistance becomes a duty.
It is the duty of every patriotic Malaysians not to view what is happening to Guan Eng as an isolated case of selective persecution. Today it is Guan Eng, tomorrow we don’t know who will be targeted next. That is why it is our duty to stand up in solidarity and oppose injustice whenever it takes place. Together, we can – and must – fight this battle against the backdoor, illegitimate government till the day of persecution is over.
