Zahid’s DNAA: A Nail in the Coffin for PMX’s Reformist Credibility

(NW) : Zahid Hamidi’s second DNAA (discharge not amounting to an acquittal) is a political bombshell that casts significant doubt on the Madani government’s integrity and reformist credentials.

While legally not an acquittal, the decision to drop these charges reinforces perceptions of political interference, which could be disastrous for PMX’s promise of good governance.

Here’s what it means for the Madani government:
1. Erosion of Public Trust
The DNAA fuels skepticism among the public, especially among those who hoped for a clean government under PMX. His alliance with Zahid and UMNO was always contentious, and this decision strengthens allegations that it was a strategic compromise for political survival rather than reform.

2. Impact on Reform Narrative
Anwar’s reformist agenda is now increasingly seen as hollow. Key slogans like anti-corruption and judicial independence ring hollow when a figure like Zahid, with multiple corruption charges, appears to benefit from political protection.

3. Undermining Institutional Independence
This DNAA raises concerns about the independence of Malaysia’s prosecutorial agencies. Even if the decision was made based on legal grounds, the perception that the executive arm influenced the outcome damages Malaysia’s reputation as a democracy striving for accountability.

4. Weakening the Unity Government
Anwar’s reliance on Zahid and UMNO for political stability has backfired, alienating key supporters, including Pakatan Harapan’s base. This move risks fragmenting his coalition and emboldening the opposition, particularly Perikatan Nasional, which has been quick to capitalise on the controversy.
5. Bolstering Opposition Narrative
The opposition will undoubtedly use this DNAA to attack the government, framing it as hypocritical and corrupt. Perikatan Nasional can now position itself as the true anti-corruption force, leveraging this issue to strengthen its support base.
6. Implications for Future Elections
This decision could cost the Madani government support in upcoming state and national elections. Urban and middle-class voters, who were key to Pakatan Harapan’s victories, are likely to view the government as morally compromised.

In summary, this second DNAA deepens the political and ethical dilemmas facing Anwar’s government. While it may preserve short-term political stability, the long-term costs—in credibility, public trust, and electoral support—could prove devastating. Anwar’s leadership now faces a critical test: whether he can convincingly address this issue without losing the moral high ground he once claimed.

Source : Newswav